Right-click the Start button. First, log into your old computer and make sure you close Firefox. Copying Old Firefox Settings.You can use one of them to retrieve an existing profile or create a new default profile for Firefox.A new interface design, called Proton, will launch in Firefox 89, scheduled for a release on June 1, 2021. Right-click the Mozilla folder and select Copy.how-run-Firefox-when-profile-missing-inaccessible. This will open the AppData folder where Firefox data are saved along with data for other applications.
The Compact density option won't be displayed anymore on the "customize" page of the browser if it has not been used in the past. Proton will remove some options from Firefox, or hide them. One common denominator is that everything will be a big larger in the new interface. Firefox 89 ships with address bar, toolbar, tab and menu changes. This can happen if you delete, rename or move the. If your Mozilla application cannot find the profile folder it will typically report that the profile is in use or, in Firefox, Thunderbird, and SeaMonkey 2, that the application 'is already running, but is not responding' or that your 'profile cannot be loaded.It may be missing or inaccessible'. Load about:config in the Firefox address bar. It reduces padding and other design elements to improve the usability for users who prefer light interfaces over large ones. Another option is to modify user interface elements with CSS.Firefox UI Fix includes CSS fixes that modify the Firefox 89+ user interface to make the interface more compact. This tutorial will apply for MacBook Pro.Firefox users who want a design that is more compact may use the linked guide above to enable the compact density option in the browser to start using it. Firefox mac spinning beach ball. Firefox mac profile missing. Use the toggle button to set the value of the preference to TRUE.Once done, download the two CSS files from the project's Github repository. Search for svg.context-properties.content.enabled. Use the toggle button to set its value to TRUE. You may close Firefox now.Create a "chrome" folder in the profile root if it does not exist. Repeat the steps for the userContent.css file.In Firefox, load about:support and activate the "show folder" button next to Profile Folder this opens the profile folder in the file browser on the system. The filename should be userChrome.css on your computer. Firefox Profile Missing Software Team MoreNo wonder conspiracy theorists believe Mozilla’s doing this due to pressure from sugar daddy Google, because it boggles the mind that any organization would deliberately alienate its loyal user base and destroy its product like this. Haven’t come across any software team more self-deluded than this in a very, very long time. And even if Chrome did copy some small bit of Firefox’s UI, are you too blind to see that the shoe’s now firmly on the other foot and all Firefox does is desperately try to copy Chrome, down to the last menu item and wording? (No matter that loyal users are pissed off by the irrational and clearly negative changes.) The shortsighted Mozilla people even openly declare this to be what their UI team is doing, in an exceedingly idiotic bass-ackwards attempt to try and regain some of the precious users they’ve lost. On the bottom right of the page, you see a 1, 2, 3 (it probably says “Popular Posts by ” or something like that), mostly covered by the open menu. We’re only talking fractions of millimeters, here, from the views on this page, but it will be more evident when it’s on your computer screen.In any case, all the vertical space that is saved at the top and bottom of the address bar and the top and bottom of the tab bar is raising the height of the page and is given back to you at the bottom of the page. There is an even more distinguishable difference at the top of the address bar � say, from the top of the “h” in the url to the top of the box. In the url, for instance, the amount of space between the bottom of that low hanging “g” and the lower edge of the address bar box is … well, slightly less in the second view than in the first. The same is true of the address bar.Next, this is how I initially resolved that the menu must also be slightly more compact in the second view than the first (though after looking at it for as long as I have to write this, I can now pretty easily the difference just by looking at it):Look again at the difference in height in the tabs and address bar in the two versions. You’re to notice a difference in the height of the tabs, or tab boxes, and in the address bar and menu, too.If you look closely at the top inside edge of the highlighted tab box and check it’s distance to the top of the letters inside that tab box (and do the same again at the bottom of the tab box), you’ll notice there is slightly less space in these areas in Compact mode � the second view (or the “after” view, if you prefer, though both views are AFTER this article’s proposed fix to the v.89 update, just one is showing the fix in normal mode while the second shows it in compact mode) � than there is in Normal mode � the first view. Windows game emulator for macIn case it’s not clear, none of this has anything to do with interface utility it’s entirely driven by fads in design and the weird population of people who get off on change for its own sake. I do find it hilarious that they’ve almost come full circle back to exactly that design, while still bafflingly keeping the breakout-and-tabbed menu style at all on horizontally-oriented desktop/laptop computer screens with mouse control* (the tabbed menus are useful for touch interfaces because there is no hover control for touch interfaces, and the hamburger button dropping a single vertical menu is only good for screens that lack horizontal space for a menu bar and/or benefit from a larger, more square icon as a finger target, as it necessarily hides features multiple clicks deep by collapsing distinct top-level menus under the hamburger).A few years back, they were INSISTING that removing text in favor of icons was a much better interface that more people found more intuitively useful (this started in a serious way with Microsoft pushing their Ribbon instead of having menus), which was never true (text is far less ambiguous than icons, ESPECIALLY for users not already familiar with a particular design language). There is clearly more space in Compact mode between the bottom of the menu and the text, “…from Firefox’s Customize…” on the page behind it than there is in Normal mode, by probably a full mm or more.So, even though the space savings in the bars at the top has pulled everything on the page up by maybe 4 mm or so (as is evident at the bottom of the page), the difference in where the bottom of the menu is in relation to the text behind it is still probably another full millimeter higher yet, so the menu itself must have shrunk by at least 5 mm!I don’t really care about icons in the breakout menu – I restored the top menu bar as soon as it was removed by default the first time in an ill-advised design move years ago. In Normal mode, the “g” couldn’t be any closer to the bottom without touching it, but in Compact mode, there’s so much space you can even (just barely) see the top of the text of whatever #4 would be.But right now, we’re supposed to be talking about whether the open menu is more compact, too, right? The reason I highlighted the space that’s saved at the bottom of the page, even in this context, is that that space savings (or difference in height) will be uniform at any point on the page, because Compact view will only affect the browser interface, not shrink the page you’re viewing itself.To see the difference in the compactness of the menu in Compact mode, look at the bottom edge of the open menu in relation to the text on the page behind it. All the space saved by Compact mode in the bars at the top can be seen in the space between the bottom of the low hanging “g” in “…changed in Firefox 88.0” and the bottom edge of the page. Stop making your psychological issues around aesthetic boredom a functional issue for other people.And UI changes ALWAYS disrupt the experience of the existing user base, negatively impacting utility/productivity there is no such thing as a UI change without a negative impact on user experience. That’s win-win pointlessly (at best, harmfully at worst) changing the UI for everyone is win-lose. People who get “bored” with a UI or get a dopamine hit when something looks different than it did yesterday can simply change themes every once in a while to achieve that effect without having to impact the entire rest of the user base. And there was already a solution that doesn’t involve breaking things for other people: themes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJack ArchivesCategories |